Author's Description:

In the early 1990s, Philips introduced a line of components known as the “900 Series”, or simply “900”. Generally speaking, the series had two incarnations: the original release in 1992 and a mildly revised version in 1993.

Today, the best-remembered components from this lineup are probably the amplifiers and CD players — for example the CD950, which employed Philips’ then-flagship DAC TDA1547 and the CDM-9 transport, as well as the FA950 and FA951 amplifiers.

The series spanned a very wide range, from entry-level through mid-range and all the way to higher-end components. The most expensive and top-tier models were reserved for Marantz, which at the time was owned by Philips.

To the best of my knowledge, this was the last true Hi-Fi series ever launched by Philips.

I could say much more about this, but let’s get to the point. The 900 Series generally included three cassette deck models: one dual-cassette deck and two single-well decks. Of the two single decks, one was a two-head auto-reverse model, while the other belonged to the three-head category.

Some time ago, I came across two cassette decks for sale locally, offered as a pair: the FC950, Philips’ flagship three-head deck, and the single-well auto-reverse FC920, which, according to the seller, was defective. Defective? Hmmm… that sounded interesting.

The price was reasonable, so I bought them. Since I already owned an FC950 — though I had never written about it — I decided to leave it for later. What really intrigued me was the supposedly faulty FC920.

The full model designation is 70FC920. It appeared on the market in 1992 and carried a retail price of 450 DEM (€225). It was manufactured at Philips’ factory in Singapore.

Let’s start with a description.

Like the other components in the 900 Series, the FC920 features a distinctive graphite finish that shimmers as if the paint itself contains crystalline particles — something very rarely seen in Hi-Fi. The design is also distinctive and striking: the main controls are positioned beneath the cassette door, mounted on an angled support to improve ergonomics. Excellent.

However, the front panel is entirely plastic, except for the recording level control knob — though it doesn’t look cheap, unlike some Harman/Kardon components from the same era.

In terms of features, the FC920 is nothing special — quite the opposite. Dolby B and C, track search (one track only…) forward or backward, blank search, CD synchronization… and that’s about it. Yes, it does have HX Pro, which is a plus.

The peak meters are not backlit, nor is the cassette well. Speaking of meters: there are seven LEDs per channel, with permanent peak-hold enabled across the entire range, not just above 0 dB as is customary. Additionally, all LEDs are the same color — red — instead of green below 0 dB and red above. As a result, level monitoring is challenging, and in low-light conditions almost impossible unless you memorize exactly how many LEDs can light up before entering the “red.” Completely pointless.

Operating status, Dolby mode, Blank Search, etc., are indicated by small LEDs that either light up or blink. The LEDs for Dolby B and C are the same color — red. The entire system feels sparse, ascetic, and not particularly intuitive. Larger, multi-colored LEDs or a multifunction display would have been far superior.

It should also be noted that the FC920 does not feature fast auto-reverse, i.e. an optical sensor that detects the transparent leader at the end of the tape and reverses head direction before the tape actually runs out. They really didn’t try very hard here.

On top of that, the tape counter is purely mechanical, with no additional functions whatsoever. A disgrace considering how much the FC920 cost. For the record, it reaches 500 turns on a C60 cassette, slightly above the old standard.

The central processor maintains absolute button logic regardless of tape direction: when the tape runs in reverse, rewind is still rewind, but executed in the opposite physical direction. In other words, depending on the main tape direction (normal or reverse), the transport commands mirror their functions relative to normal operation.

At one point I thought this deck must have been designed by NAD rather than Philips — it’s that spartan… perhaps even more so than NAD.

It’s also worth mentioning that there is no traditional Record button. To start recording, you must press Pause and Rec Mute simultaneously, which puts the deck into Record-Pause mode. Interesting.

During use, I could not get the FC920 to stop recording when infinite auto-reverse was enabled. Normally, auto-reverse decks have two modes: A+B, where the deck plays side A, then side B, and stops; and infinite, where it loops endlessly until stopped manually (or power is cut).

During recording, however, the behavior should be different: regardless of whether A+B or infinite mode is selected, the deck should stop at the end of side B, since endlessly recording the same cassette makes no sense. With the Philips FC920, I was unable to achieve this — it kept recording in a loop. This is, in fact, a software bug in the deck’s microcontroller: the programmer simply forgot to add a condition in the recording loop.

How does it compare to the competition?

For roughly one-third more money, you could buy the FC950:

• You’d lose auto-reverse, but

• Gain a true three-head deck

• A proper dual-color fluorescent peak meter with peak hold

• A digital counter

• A 2+1 motor transport

• Variable bias

• Motorized cassette door

Even the FC950 may have been overpriced for what it offered (600 DEM). The very popular Aiwa AD-F850 featured a closed-loop dual-capstan transport and everything the FC950 had — for 500 DEM (later even 450). Two years later, the Technics RS-BX501 offered auto-calibration, a small but far more informative display with a digital counter, and additional features — for the same money.

In conclusion, based on features alone, the FC920 should never have cost more than 300 DEM, about one-third less than its actual price. Philips really could have done more — I got the impression far too often that they were working against themselves.

Inside

First, a word about the chassis: thin sheet metal all around, but the top cover itself is quite solid, which is good.

Secondly, the FC920 has a removable bottom electronics cover, something manufacturers were already starting to abandon at the time, forcing full PCB removal for servicing. Here, access is easy.

What’s interesting is that the bottom cover was created by machine-cutting an opening in the chassis, but in such a clever way that the removed piece simply becomes the cover after being rotated along two axes. In other words, both the bottom panel and the cover are made from the same piece of metal, without any additional elements to prevent the cover from falling through the opening. Brilliant.

Internally, the FC920 is neat, well organized, with minimal wiring and clearly defined sections.

What surprised me was the bias adjustment: for normal tapes there are separate trimmers for each channel, plus two additional ones (for L+R) for chrome and metal tapes. This solution is uncommon and usually reserved for more expensive, three-head decks. Excellent.

The transport is based on a single motor, driving two flywheels in opposite directions via belts (a standard auto-reverse solution), plus an additional belt for fast winding.

The servo system relies on an electromagnetic actuator engaging the right flywheel and its gear. Depending on activation duration, this mechanism changes deck modes: fast winding, play/record in either direction, etc.

The flywheels are not particularly large or heavy, but adequate. The mechanism itself is complex and awkward, yet should be durable overall. Belt replacement is a nightmare — the PCB must be desoldered and unscrewed, and I even removed the motor. The flywheels are not secured by a conventional rear retaining plate (even though space for one exists), but instead by plastic clips on the shafts — purely to save costs.

Due to the mechanical counter, the FC920 uses two additional belts, bringing the total to four. A pity, since the deck already employs optical rotation sensing for auto-reverse and auto-stop, which could have been used for a digital counter.

A few photos of the front of the mechanism:

The cassette door mechanism is mechanically complex but uses excellent plastic that neither creaks nor squeaks — executed to perfection.

The cassette carrier itself is plastic but of good quality, and its cover is curved and well made.

Repair

The issue with my FC920 was intermittent operation. It would occasionally indicate readiness, but upon pressing a command it would start, raise the heads (you could hear the actuator), then immediately lower them again and stop. Sometimes it wouldn’t respond at all.

I partially disassembled the mechanism and saw that the deck had barely been used. I initially suspected hardened grease or oil causing mechanical timing issues, prompting the processor to abort operations.

Everything seemed fine. I replaced all belts, suspecting slippage — though realistically the symptoms didn’t quite match.

The deck improved, but intermittently failed again.

I cleaned connectors, re-soldered micro-switches, and suspected the head-up confirmation switch — a critical timing element. After cleaning, things improved somewhat.

I spent three days wrestling with this “cheap little deck.” At the end of day two, I received a wonderful message from my friend Amar in Sarajevo, who sent me the service manual, which I hadn’t been able to find online.

From it, I learned there was a cassette-presence switch. After locating it, I tested all five micro-switches on the upper mechanism — only one worked properly. The cassette-presence switch was intermittent.

What was happening? Upon receiving a command, the processor checked cassette presence. If confirmed, it activated the actuator motor. Vibrations from the actuator would momentarily break the faulty switch contact, causing the processor to abort and return the heads to Stop.

Disassembling the micro-switch was difficult — they aren’t designed to be serviced — but I managed to clean and adjust it. Everything worked perfectly afterward.

The balance pot crackled slightly and required cleaning, which meant removing part of the front panel.

During calibration, I noticed the reverse-side azimuth was off; everything else was nearly perfect. After calibration, I was surprised by how linear the frequency response was — deviations of about +1 dB on one channel between 1 kHz and 15 kHz, and none on the other.

I used TDK FE, SA, and MA tapes for setup. On normal tape, I achieved a better frequency response than specified — nearly 18 kHz at −3 dB (1 kHz reference).

Sound

Judging by construction alone, I had no high expectations. I was wrong.

The Philips FC920 sounds very pleasant: smooth, non-fatiguing, warm, and emotionally engaging on its own recordings.

Testing was done with TDK FE and TDK SA tapes. Starting with TDK FE:

HX Pro is excellently implemented, with no sibilance issues or artificially emphasized highs — common problems with cheaper decks. Instead, it preserves upper-end detail cleanly and naturally. Excellent.

Vocals are very good, reminiscent of older decks. The FC920 isn’t as crystal-clear as, say, the Harman/Kardon TD4500, but it is musical and likable, while still clean enough that no real smearing is audible.

Bass is strong, soft, and warm — pleasing, though not perfectly defined. There is a slight “roundness” to it, subtle but present.

Switching to chrome tape (TDK SA) retained the same character, with slightly better bass definition and an extra layer of high-frequency detail. The soundstage widened slightly and became a bit brighter. The deck performs very well on both normal and chrome tapes, maintaining consistency while clearly benefiting from better media.

Considering its price class, the FC920 sounds very, very good, and even in absolute terms has little to hide. I expected playback to be its only strength, but it turned out to be a surprisingly competent recorder as well — far better than anticipated.

Conclusion

The Philips FC920 is an excellent deck if you have a cassette collection you want to enjoy — and perhaps record anew. If you can live with its limited feature set and the many omissions Philips chose not to implement, this deck may be for you.

If, however, you want a prettier, flashier, more visually impressive machine — for yourself or for show — this Philips has nothing to offer except sound… and excessive modesty.

Comments are closed.